Thoughts on the 2010-2011 Calendar
Thoughts on the Calendar
To this point I have remained relatively silent regarding the calendar options that have been presented for the 2010-2011 school year. This was by choice as my opinion is that: a) I am not on the committee and have one vote just like everyone else, and b) I do not want to influence the committee unduly.They are charged with a difficult task and are giving of their own time in order to serve the county. However, at this point I feel that I should at least share my opinion.
This is my twenty-second year in education and I have never seen so much energy devoted to the calendar issue. Why is this happening? I think the answer is pretty simple: the calendar options represent significant change, and change makes many people very uncomfortable. I am disappointed with some of the erroneous information and/or rumors that have been circulating, but this is to be expected, I suppose.
I support the earlier start date for several reasons:
·An earlier start date means that, ultimately, first semester ends by winter break. Currently, when students return from winter break, instructional time must be taken to review content taught prior to the holiday to prepare them for benchmarks and SOL tests.By ending the first semester prior to winter break, instructional time is gained because less time is needed to review.
·In the past, we have received many complaints from parents about the lack of quality instruction after SOL testing.With this calendar, SOL testing will run through the end of the school year.The last several days of school after testing concludes are difficult instructionally to say the least. If school is dismissed soon after testing, meaningful instruction can occur through the end of school.
·Students and teachers will temporarily lose five days of summer vacation during the summer of 2010 and the summer of 2011 only. No one is crazy about this but, in the long run, it will be worth it.
·It will be much easier to justify a two week holiday vacation EVERY YEAR if first semester ends before the holidays. This is exactly why I do not support a two week winter break under the current semester configuration. Sixteen days off (this includes weekends) is not good for students instructionally if they are in the midst of a unit of study, benchmark test preparation, or skill development.
The calendar committee was tasked with producing a calendar that meets the instructional needs of students first. Enhancing the instructional integrity of the calendar means change, thinking differently, and putting aside personal wants. I understand the issues that it creates, but the benefits in my mind far outweigh the negatives. The committee had a tough job and there was much debate.I am very grateful and applaud their hard work. My hunch is that none of them will be eager to serve on this committee again. I can’t blame them.

![Download file "Dec_09_Newsletter[1].pdf" Download file "Dec_09_Newsletter[1].pdf"](/users/djeck/weblog/3fa97/attachments/4cfd1/Dec_09_Newsletter[1].pdf.png)
![Download file "111109_Budget_Hearing_for_FY11[1].ppt" Download file "111109_Budget_Hearing_for_FY11[1].ppt"](/users/djeck/weblog/ee6e4/attachments/5eb9a/111109_Budget_Hearing_for_FY11[1].ppt.png)

